Clinical impact and risk stratification of balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal disease in nitinol stenting era: Retrospective multicenter study using propensity score matching analysis

نویسندگان

  • Taketsugu Tsuchiya
  • Takaaki Takamura
  • Yoshimitsu Soga
  • Osamu Iida
  • Keisuke Hirano
  • Kenji Suzuki
  • Terutoshi Yamaoka
  • Yusuke Miyashita
  • Michihiko Kitayama
  • Koji Kajinami
چکیده

OBJECTIVE Nitinol stenting could bring the better outcome in endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal disease. However, it might be expected that recent marked advances in both device technology and operator technique had led to improved efficacy of balloon angioplasty even in this segment. The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical impact of balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal disease and make risk stratification clear by propensity score matching analysis. METHODS Based on the multicenter retrospective data, 2758 patients (balloon angioplasty: 729 patients and nitinol stenting: 2029 patients), those who underwent endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal disease, were analyzed. RESULTS The propensity score matching procedure extracted a total of 572 cases per group, and the primary patency rate of balloon angioplasty and nitinol stenting groups after matching was significantly the same (77.2% vs 82.7% at 1 year; 62.2% vs 64.3% at 3 years; 47.8% vs 54.3% at 5 years). In multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis, significant predictors for primary patency were diabetes mellitus, regular dialysis, cilostazol use, chronic total occlusion, and intra-vascular ultra-sonography use. The strategy of balloon angioplasty was not evaluated as a significant predictor for the primary patency. After risk stratification using five items (diabetes mellitus, regular dialysis, no use of intra-vascular ultra-sonography, chronic total occlusion, and no use of cilostazol: the DDICC score), the estimated primary patency rates of each group (low, DDICC score 0-2; moderate, DDICC score 3; high risk, DDICC score 4-5) were 88.6%, 78.3%, and 63.5% at 1 year; 75.2%, 60.7%, and 39.8% at 3 years; and 66.0%, 47.1%, and 26.3% at 5 years (p < 0.0001). The primary patency rate of balloon angioplasty and nitinol stenting groups was significantly the same in each risk stratification. CONCLUSION This study suggests that balloon angioplasty does not have inferiority to nitinol stenting but does have favorable efficacy in femoropopliteal segment by careful risk stratification with the recent advance of technique.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Sustained Benefit at 2 Years of Primary Femoropopliteal Stenting Compared With Balloon Angioplasty With Optional Stenting

Background—Primary stenting with self-expanding nitinol stents of the superficial femoral artery yielded improved morphological and clinical results compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting until 12 months in a randomized controlled trial. We now report 2-year data on restenosis and clinical outcomes of these patients. Methods and Results—Of 104 patients with chronic limb ischem...

متن کامل

Commentary. Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting.

BACKGROUND Primary stenting with self-expanding nitinol stents of the superficial femoral artery yielded improved morphological and clinical results compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting until 12 months in a randomized controlled trial. We now report 2-year data on restenosis and clinical outcomes of these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Of 104 patients with chronic limb isch...

متن کامل

Letter by Golledge regarding article, "Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting".

Benefit at 2 Years of Primary Femoropopliteal Stenting Compared With Balloon Angioplasty With Optional Stenting” To the Editor: I read with interest the 2-year results of the Balloon Angioplasty Versus Stenting With Nitinol Stents in the Superficial Femoral Artery (ABSOLUTE) trial, which investigated the value of nitinol stents in the treatment of superficial femoral artery stenoses or occlusio...

متن کامل

Relative No - Stent Zones in the Femoropopliteal Arteries

A s endovascular therapy has revolutionized the treatment of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) over the past decade, no single therapy has emerged as the clear gold standard. Acceptance of endovascular therapy has been quick among practitioners, but there remains question about which technology is best and most durable in any particular vascular bed. As techniques and technology...

متن کامل

Drug-Coated Balloons for Long Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: Leaving Nothing Behind in the Real-World.

SEE PAGE 950 T he optimal endovascular strategy for treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) atherosclerotic disease is an evolving area of research and clinical practice. Initial randomized trials demonstrated a benefit of nitinol self-expanding stent placement in this region when compared to standalone balloon angioplasty (1). However, observational studies subsequently raised concerns r...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016